By Hasan Legal Admin · October 9, 2026
The H-1B is the largest guest-worker visa program in the United States and the most important channel for high-skilled immigration. The most detailed recent public snapshot of who actually receives it comes from fiscal year 2022 — and it shows a program with high approval rates, a heavy concentration in computer-related jobs, and salaries well above the national norm. It's also a snapshot of a very different era. Fees, lottery odds, and the safety net around H-1B status have all been in motion since, so we've put the 2022 figures side by side with where things stand today.
The H-1B is the largest guest-worker visa program in the United States and the most important channel for high-skilled immigration. The most detailed recent public snapshot of who actually receives it comes from fiscal year 2022 — and it shows a program with high approval rates, a heavy concentration in computer-related jobs, and salaries well above the national norm.
It's also a snapshot of a very different era. Fees, lottery odds, and the safety net around H-1B status have all been in motion since, so we've put the 2022 figures side by side with where things stand today.
Numbers like these are useful context, but they describe the program as it operated in fiscal year 2022, not as it operates in late 2026. Read the first half of this piece as background. Read the second half as the reason that background no longer tells the whole story.
The H-1B was created by the Immigration Act of 1990 and is administered by USCIS. It lets a U.S. employer sponsor a foreign professional for a specialty occupation — one that requires specialized knowledge and, generally, at least a bachelor's degree. The worker's status is tied to that sponsoring employer.
New H-1B petitions are limited by an annual cap: 65,000 for regular applicants, plus a separate 20,000 for applicants with a master's degree or higher from a U.S. institution — 85,000 in total. Petitions for institutions of higher education, their affiliated nonprofits, and nonprofit or government research organizations are generally cap-exempt. Demand far exceeds the cap, so USCIS runs a lottery among registrations; petitions filed for selected registrations are processed, and everyone else waits for the next year. Approved status generally begins on October 1, the start of the fiscal year.
| Measure (FY2022) | Figure |
|---|---|
| Total H-1B approvals (initial + continuing employment) | 442,043 |
| Denial rate, initial employment | 2% (4% in FY2021) |
| Share of approvals to workers from India | ~73% |
| Share of approvals to workers from China | ~12.5% |
| Share of approvals in computer-related occupations | 66% |
| Architecture, engineering, and surveying | 9.8% |
| Median annual salary of approved workers | $118,000 (up from $108,000 in FY2021) |
| Median age of approved workers | 33 |
| Approvals by gender | ~70.8% male, ~29% female |
Indian nationals received nearly 73% of approved petitions in FY2022, with China second at about 12.5%. The next eight countries combined accounted for only about 6%. The figures we're drawing on don't break out Bangladeshi workers separately, which is itself a reminder of how concentrated this program is in a small number of countries.
Nearly two-thirds of initial-employment approvals went to workers aged 25 to 34, while extensions skewed older, with roughly 63% aged 30 to 39. Men received a large majority of approvals overall, though the split varies by country — among workers from the Philippines, for example, women received roughly 58.7% of approvals. By occupation, computer-related jobs dominated at 66% of approvals, and within that group, systems analysis and programming accounted for nearly 55%. Extensions outnumbered first-time petitions in every occupational category except education.
USCIS approved 442,043 H-1B petitions in FY2022, more than in each of the four prior years. The 2% denial rate for initial employment that year was a record low, down from 4% in FY2021. That figure is not a constant, though. The same dataset shows denial rates peaking at 24% in FY2018 and ranging between roughly 5% and 8% in earlier years — a reminder that approval odds depend heavily on adjudication posture and policy, not just on the strength of any individual petition.
Part of the reason denial rates tend to run low is cost and effort. The National Foundation for American Policy estimated that an employer could pay between $3,900 and $18,150 in government and attorney fees for an initial H-1B petition, and as much as $31,800 for an initial petition plus an extension. When filing is that expensive, employers are selective about what they file. Keep that number in mind — it matters in the comparison below.
The source report states that H-1B "applications" rose 61% to 780,884 in a single year. That figure appears to correspond to the March 2023 registration period rather than to FY2022 petition data, and registrations are not the same thing as petitions. If you cite it, confirm the exact label and period against USCIS's published registration data.
Critics of the program argue that employers use it to pay foreign workers less than they would have to pay U.S. workers in the same jobs, or to displace U.S. workers outright. The research cited in this dataset points the other way on wages: H-1B workers' salaries tend to sit in the top tier of U.S. wages, and several studies found that highly skilled foreign workers are not paid less than comparable U.S. counterparts. The median computer-related H-1B salary rose 26% between 2018 and 2022.
Employers are also legally required to pay at least the prevailing wage for the occupation and location, and they attest to that through a Labor Condition Application filed with the Department of Labor before the petition is submitted. The broader debate over the program's effect on the domestic workforce is ongoing, and a single year of data won't settle it — but wage levels are one of the places where the numbers are clearer than the rhetoric.
The same report highlights what happens when H-1B workers lose their jobs — a live issue after waves of technology-sector layoffs. Under current rules, a laid-off worker generally has 60 days to find a new sponsoring employer, change to another status, or leave the country. A presidential panel previously urged extending that window to 180 days, without result.
That window is now under threat in the opposite direction. DHS has proposed eliminating the 60-day grace period altogether for several employment-based categories, which we cover in detail in our piece on the proposal. It is not yet in effect.
The FY2022 picture is a program with modest government fees, a short safety net, and enormous demand. Here is how a few of those factors compare with where things stand as of October 2026.
| Factor | The FY2022-era snapshot | Where things stand now |
|---|---|---|
| Employer cost per initial petition | $3,900–$18,150 in government and attorney fees (NFAP estimate) | DHS has proposed an additional $103,265 fee on cap-subject petitions; a separate $100,000 payment under a September 2025 proclamation has been tied up in litigation. Neither the new proposal nor a final resolution of the litigation should be assumed — verify current status. |
| Demand vs. the cap | Registrations far exceeded the 85,000 cap | The FY2027 cap was reached at the petition stage, as USCIS announced in July 2026. DHS's own analysis of its fee proposal projects roughly 85,000 cap-subject filings a year, down from an average of about 108,910 in fiscal years 2024 and 2025. |
| Safety net after job loss | 60-day grace period (a longer window was urged but not adopted) | DHS has proposed eliminating the 60-day grace period for several employment-based categories; not yet in effect. |
We've covered each of these developments separately — the litigation over the $100,000 payment, the new $103,265 fee proposal, and the FY2027 cap announcement — so we won't repeat the details here. The point is simply that the cost, the odds, and the cushion all look different from the snapshot above.
A dataset of approved petitions only describes people who got through. It says nothing about the much larger group whose registrations weren't selected, whose employers decided the cost wasn't worth it, or whose status ended when a job did. Three structural features of the H-1B explain most of that:
None of that makes the H-1B a bad path — for many people it remains the right one. But it's worth knowing that EB-2 NIW, EB-1A, and O-1 don't carry those same three dependencies, and that for qualified researchers, engineers, and physicians, they can run in parallel with whatever status you hold today.
This article draws on a report built from FY2022 public data, with later-period context added by us. Newer annual H-1B characteristics reports from USCIS exist, and the political and regulatory commentary in older reports about future administrations has been left out here because events have overtaken it. For any figure you plan to rely on, check the current USCIS H-1B Employer Data Hub and the latest characteristics report.
If you're on H-1B status — or weren't selected this year — and want to understand whether a self-petition under EB-2 NIW or EB-1A could reduce your dependence on a lottery and a single employer, we can review your profile with you. We also handle O-1 petitions.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Statistics are drawn from FY2022 public data as compiled in a secondary report and should be verified against the current USCIS and Department of Labor sources before being cited or relied upon. Fee proposals, litigation, and rulemaking described here are fast-moving and may have changed since publication. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Consult a licensed immigration attorney about your specific circumstances.