By Hasan Legal Admin · August 20, 2026
The State Department has launched a pilot in Mexico letting some B-1/B-2 applicants pay an extra $750 to get an interview appointment within 10 business days. It's a narrow program — but it's also a fairly direct admission of how backed up standard visa interview scheduling has become. Here's what the pilot actually offers, what it doesn't, and why applicants further along in the immigration process — those pursuing a green card rather than a visit — have reason to care about the underlying problem it's responding to
The State Department has launched a pilot in Mexico letting some B-1/B-2 applicants pay an extra $750 to get an interview appointment within 10 business days. It's a narrow program — but it's also a fairly direct admission of how backed up standard visa interview scheduling has become.
Here's what the pilot actually offers, what it doesn't, and why applicants further along in the immigration process — those pursuing a green card rather than a visit — have reason to care about the underlying problem it's responding to.
Paying more to get seen sooner is not a new idea in immigration processing, but it's a notable one when it shows up at the consular interview stage — historically one of the more rigid, non-negotiable bottlenecks in the system.
The program allows certain B-1 and B-2 visa applicants in Mexico to pay an additional $750 for an interview appointment within 10 business days, subject to availability. It runs through December 31, 2026. It is explicitly a pilot — limited in scope and geography, not a general policy change to how visa interviews are scheduled worldwide.
Paying the fee buys a faster appointment slot — nothing more. It does not guarantee visa approval, and it does not speed up any processing that happens after the interview itself. An applicant who pays $750 for a faster interview can still be denied, and can still wait the normal amount of time for a decision afterward.
A pilot that lets applicants pay to skip ahead in an interview queue is, functionally, an acknowledgment that the queue itself is long enough to be worth monetizing. Visa interview wait times at U.S. consulates have varied significantly by post and season, and a program built specifically around cutting a 10-business-day path through that backlog says something about how long the standard path currently runs in at least some locations.
For visitor visa applicants, that's a scheduling inconvenience with a price tag attached. For people at a different stage of the immigration process — pursuing permanent status rather than a visit — the same underlying backlog carries higher stakes, because it touches immigrant visa interviews too, not just B-1/B-2 appointments.
Anyone pursuing an immigrant visa through a U.S. consulate abroad is exposed to the same interview-scheduling pressure this pilot is responding to — just with far more at stake per appointment. That's one more reason the distinction between consular processing and adjustment of status matters more than it might seem.
An applicant who is already inside the United States on valid status and files an EB-2 NIW or EB-1A self-petition can, once their priority date is current, adjust status through Form I-485 domestically — a process that does not require a consular interview abroad at all in many cases, and instead moves entirely through USCIS. That doesn't make adjustment of status immune from its own processing delays, but it does mean the specific backlog behind this pilot program isn't automatically theirs to navigate.
Whether an interview is required at all — for both adjustment of status and certain immigrant visa categories — depends on current USCIS policy and the specific facts of the case. Confirm interview requirements for your category before assuming either path skips this step entirely.
This pilot sits alongside a broader trend worth watching: paid expedite options appearing at more stages of an immigration case, from premium processing on petitions to now, in a limited pilot, the interview scheduling step itself. None of these programs shorten the substantive legal standards an applicant has to meet — they only affect how quickly a case moves through the queue to be evaluated against those standards.
Interview backlogs and pilot programs come and go. A self-petition under EB-2 NIW or EB-1A, filed and adjusted from inside the U.S. where eligible, sidesteps a meaningful part of this problem entirely. We also handle O-1 petitions for applicants with a strong record of achievement.
This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Pilot program terms, visa interview requirements, and processing times change periodically — verify current details against travel.state.gov and uscis.gov before relying on them. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Consult a licensed immigration attorney about your specific circumstances.